Are Prediction Markets Gambling

Jessica Miller is the Content Manager of Addiction HelpWritten by
Kent S. Hoffman, D.O. is a founder of Addiction HelpMedically reviewed by Kent S. Hoffman, D.O.
Last updated

Battling addiction & ready for help?

Find Treatment Now

You can buy a contract today on whether a candidate wins the next election. The federal agency that oversees the exchange says you’re trading a financial product. Gambling regulators in several states say you’re placing a bet. They are in court over it right now. The people whose entire job is drawing the line between trading and gambling cannot agree which side of it these apps sit on.

If event betting is taking the rent Practical steps to stop the bleeding tonight
If betting has reached money you can’t lose, or you’re having thoughts of suicide, call or text 988 right now, or call 911.

Then:

  • Hand the money to someone you trust. Give a partner or friend access to the account and the card for a while, so a 2 a.m. urge can’t become a 2 a.m. bet.
  • Get the app off the phone tonight. Delete it, add a blocker, or close the account. Speed and access are where the danger lives.
  • Tell one person the real number. Debt grows in secret. Saying the figure out loud to someone safe is how the spiral starts to slow.

Reach the National Problem Gambling Helpline → (1-800-GAMBLER), free and confidential, any hour.

Behind the fight: apps like Kalshi and Polymarket sell “event contracts,” yes-or-no positions on real-world outcomes, priced in cents, settled the moment the event resolves. Kalshi runs as a federally regulated exchange overseen by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which treats these contracts as financial swaps, not bets. Several state gambling regulators have argued the opposite, that a contract on an election or a ball game is functionally a wager, and the question is in active litigation as you read this.

But nobody looks this up to handicap a court case. Most people typing “are prediction markets gambling” at 1 a.m. already have a guess, and what they want to know is whether the guess is right.

Here is the working answer: if you can’t stop, if the next contract exists to fix the last one, if the app is the first thing you check in the morning and the last thing you close at night, then whatever a judge eventually rules, event betting is working on you the way gambling works. This is for the person living that version of the question.

AddictionHelp.com Fast Facts
  • An event contract is a yes-or-no bet. Elections, games, weather, news: pick a side for cents on the dollar, collect $1 if you’re right.
  • Even the regulators disagree. The CFTC oversees these markets as financial exchanges; state gambling regulators call the contracts wagers. It’s in court now.
  • Built like a bet. Fast, binary, win-or-lose, open around the clock, with the next contract always waiting.
  • Treatment works here. The same therapy that treats gambling problems fits event betting, and most people recover.

One thing belongs up front: a handful of event bets does not make anyone an addict. Plenty of people try Kalshi or Polymarket out of curiosity, win or lose a little, and drift off. The narrower question, the one everything here works through, is whether your event betting has taken on the shape of compulsive gambling.

What Prediction Markets Actually Are

A prediction market is a place to bet on what will happen and get paid if you’re right, run in the language of trading instead of the casino’s. Two things make the platforms unusual: how the bet is built, and what the law calls it.

How an Event Contract Works

On Kalshi, Polymarket, and similar platforms, you buy and sell event contracts: a “yes” or “no” share in an outcome like “Will this candidate win?” or “Will the home team cover?” Each contract is priced between 1 and 99 cents, and the price doubles as the market’s odds. A contract trading at 60 cents implies roughly a 60% chance the event happens.

Resolve your way and the contract pays $1. Resolve against you and it’s worth nothing. Billions of dollars in contracts trade across these platforms in a busy week. The asset is a real-world outcome, but the experience, pick a side, risk money, win or lose, is the anatomy of a bet.

Why It’s Framed as “Trading,” Not “Betting”

The legal framing is what makes prediction markets genuinely strange. The contracts are written up as financial instruments, swaps, and Kalshi clears them on a CFTC-regulated exchange, under the same regulator that oversees commodity futures.

So on paper, a Kalshi user is “trading,” not “betting.” Whether the paperwork changes anything for the person holding the position is the question everything that follows takes seriously.

Why Even Regulators Can’t Agree if It’s Gambling

Prediction markets sit in a gray zone because they were built to sit in one. They’re structured as financial products so they fall under federal market rules instead of state gambling law. That design choice is now the center of a real legal fight between two sets of regulators.

The Federal View Is that It’s a Regulated Financial Market

The CFTC has allowed event contracts to trade as regulated swaps, placing them in the same legal family as futures and options rather than wagers. By that logic, an exchange like Kalshi is a financial marketplace, its contracts are hedging instruments, and the person clicking “buy” is trading: federally supervised, fully legal, and not the states’ business to call gambling.

The State View Is that a Bet Is a Bet

State gambling regulators in several states have answered with cease-and-desist orders and lawsuits. Their argument is older and simpler: a bet on an election or a ball game is a bet no matter what the ticket says, and it belongs under state gambling law, with the consumer protections and limits that come with that. Courts are still sorting out who’s right, and the answer may land differently state by state.

If you’re using the legal fight to make sense of your own behavior, the stalemate is strangely clarifying. The people paid to classify this cannot cleanly call it “not gambling.” An activity close enough to gambling that regulators are fighting in court over the line is close enough to carry gambling’s risks. The label on the app was never going to decide whether you can get hooked.

RememberThe label on the app was never going to decide whether you can get hooked.

Why the Structure Mimics Betting

Set the framing aside and look at what the product asks of you: pick a side, stake money on an uncertain outcome, win or lose cleanly, get the result fast enough to go again. Those are the working parts of every form of gambling that is hard to put down. The asset is different from a slot machine’s. The loop isn’t—and the research on problem behavior keeps pointing at the loop, not the label.

A Fast, Binary Win-Or-Lose Result

Time and resolution separate investing from gambling more than anything else does. A long-term investor waits years for a gradual, ambiguous result. An event contract resolves to a clean yes or no, often within hours or days, sometimes within minutes on a fast-moving news or in-game market. You were right or you were wrong, you know immediately, and there is nothing to stop you going again.

That tight gap between action and outcome is what trains a behavior into a compulsion. In a study of more than 1,500 adults, slow, regular investing wasn’t associated with excessive behavior at all; the risk concentrated in rapid, real-time, app-based activity [1]. Binary contracts that settle fast live at exactly the end of the spectrum that study flagged.

Always Open, Always Another Bet

Most ways to bet come with a built-in pause. The slate runs out, the race is run, even a casino floor thins toward morning. A prediction-market app has no pause in it. At any hour there is a market open on some game, election, economic number, or weather front, so the session ends only when you end it.

That constant availability is a risk in itself. Across formats of online betting, the more continuous and accessible the activity, the more tightly it links to problem gambling [2]. Platforms moving money in real time, around the clock, are the ones researchers flag as the emerging concern [1]. Nothing in the product ever says closed, so “I’ll stop after this one” has to come entirely from you.

The Thinking Traps that Keep a Gambler at the Table

Event betting hides the wager inside homework. You follow the election, you’ve watched this team for a decade, you can read a forecast, so taking a position feels like analysis rather than gambling. That feeling is itself one of the oldest mechanisms in gambling.

Researchers who study high-risk online trading keep finding the same mental traps that keep a gambler in the game:

  • Fear of missing out on the move everyone else seems to be making.
  • Preoccupation with the next position.
  • Anticipated regret about sitting one out.
  • Overestimating your own skill at calling the outcome [3].

That last belief, that your knowledge lets you reliably call a close, uncertain outcome, is a version of the illusion of control, the distortion at the center of gambling disorder. Beliefs like these are so central that gambling therapy goes after them directly [4].

Illusion of controlThe sense that your knowledge or effort can sway a chance outcome. It’s a core driver of gambling disorder, and event betting feeds it by dressing the wager up as research.
Did you know?

Clinicians aren’t waiting for the courts. Researchers who reviewed stock and crypto trading found the overlap with problem gambling runs so deep that the standard gambling-disorder checklist identifies compulsive traders too [5]. The legal system may take years to decide what an event contract is. In a clinic, compulsive betting on markets already has an assessment and a treatment, both gambling’s.

When Prediction-Market Betting Becomes a Problem

If the checklist is gambling’s, the warning signs are too. Nobody needs the whole list. A few of these, showing up week after week, is reason enough to look closer.

  • Chasing losses. Opening a new position mainly to win back what the last one cost. Of everything on this list, chasing is the strongest single marker of a gambling problem [6].
  • Loss of control. Betting more, or more often, than you planned, and finding the limits you set yourself don’t hold [7].
  • Preoccupation. Checking odds in meetings, replaying settled contracts in the shower, planning the next position while someone you love is mid-sentence.
  • Needing bigger stakes. The old size stops registering, so you size up, or reach for faster and stranger markets to feel it.
  • Betting to escape. Opening positions to get out from under stress, low mood, anxiety, or a boring afternoon.
  • Hiding it. Downplaying or concealing how much you’ve bet or lost from a partner or family.
  • Risking money you can’t lose. Rent, savings, borrowed money, riding on contracts that can settle at zero.
  • Mounting damage. Debt, lost sleep, conflict at home, trouble at work, and the betting continues anyway.

Why Your Brain Treats an Event Bet Like Any Other Bet

None of this is a figure of speech. Gambling and high-risk trading tap the same reward circuitry that drives addiction to drugs and alcohol [8]. That overlap is part of why the DSM-5, the manual clinicians diagnose from, moved gambling disorder out of its old category in 2013 and grouped it with the substance addictions [9].

The app’s framing never reaches the part of you being trained. Reward circuitry can’t read a contract.

The warning signs of trading addiction → take each of these patterns further, including what they look like to the people around you.

What the Research on Prediction Markets Does and Doesn’t Say Yet

Start with what the evidence can’t tell you: there is no prediction-market-specific addiction research yet. The platforms are too new, and the clinical literature hasn’t caught up to event contracts as their own studied format.

What exists is a deep and consistent literature on the parts prediction markets are made of. Across studies of rapid, online, app-based betting and trading, the same result keeps coming back: the faster, more continuous, and more accessible the activity, the more tightly it ties to problem behavior [1] [2]. And excessive trading itself mirrors gambling disorder closely enough that clinicians can apply the same diagnostic criteria to both [7] [5].

So you won’t read a claim here that a study proves prediction markets are addictive. No such study exists. The claim is narrower and more useful: event contracts are built from the exact mechanics the evidence ties to harm, the felt experience matches, and your own experience doesn’t need to wait years for format-specific research to count.

You're not aloneYou don’t need a published study with your app’s name on it to take what you’re feeling seriously. If it’s running your days, that counts.

What Helps When Event Betting Is Out of Control

All that overlap has a practical upside. Because compulsive event betting shares the core features of gambling disorder, it responds to the help that already exists for gambling, and most people who reach for that help get the behavior back under control [10].

The best-supported treatment is cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), which has the strongest evidence base for gambling harm and goes straight at what’s running this: the chasing, the urges, and the arithmetic that says one more bet evens it out [11] [4].

A few practical moves matter alongside it:

  • Get the app off your phone. Delete the prediction-market apps, use blockers, or close the account. Speed and constant access are where the risk lives, so removing them is the most direct lever you have [1].
  • Move the keys out of reach. Let someone you trust hold the account access or the money decisions for a while, so a 2 a.m. urge can’t become a 2 a.m. bet.
  • Work on what the betting medicates. If positions are how you get away from depression, anxiety, or stress, treating that directly takes a main driver out of the cycle.
  • Bring in a counselor who knows gambling. Someone who treats behavioral addiction will know this pattern on sight, because under the contracts it’s the disorder they already treat [5].
Worth raising with a counselor“My betting looks like research, but I can’t stop and I’m chasing losses. Can we treat it as a gambling problem?”

Go deeper: crypto trading → is event betting’s closest sibling, day trading as gambling → covers the all-day version of the same loop, and trading addiction, explained → holds the full map.

Get Help for Trading Addiction

You don’t owe anyone a settled legal definition before you ask for help. Compulsive event betting is a gambling problem in every way that treatment cares about [5], and the help that works for gambling works here. The person to talk to is a therapist who understands behavioral addiction.

For free, confidential support any time, the National Problem Gambling Helpline is at 1-800-GAMBLER (1-800-426-2537). And if you or someone you love is in danger or having thoughts of suicide, call or text 988, or call 911.

If any of this lands, the next step doesn’t have to be a big one. Our treatment centers directory can point you to the right level of care. Reaching out today is a real step forward — and one you can make right now.

Frequently asked questions

Are prediction markets gambling?

It depends who you ask, and that split is the most revealing thing about them. Apps like Kalshi and Polymarket let you bet on real-world events. Kalshi runs as a CFTC-regulated exchange that treats these as financial contracts (swaps), not bets, while several state gambling regulators argue the opposite, and the question is in active litigation. For the person doing it, the experience usually settles the argument faster than the courts will: the structure is fast, binary, and open around the clock, and if you can’t stop or you’re chasing losses, it’s acting like gambling no matter what the app is called.

Is Kalshi gambling?

Legally, it’s unsettled. Kalshi operates as an exchange regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which classifies its event contracts as financial swaps rather than wagers, so on paper using Kalshi is trading, not betting. State gambling regulators have pushed back, arguing a bet on an election or a game is a bet regardless of the framing, and courts are still deciding. What matters for your own life isn’t the paperwork: if betting on Kalshi has become something you can’t stop, it carries the same risks as gambling and responds to the same help.

What is an event contract on Kalshi or Polymarket?

An event contract is a yes-or-no bet on a real-world outcome: an election, a sports result, an economic number, the weather. Each contract is priced between 1 and 99 cents, and the price doubles as the implied odds, so a contract at 60 cents implies roughly a 60% chance the event happens. If the event resolves your way, the contract pays $1. If it doesn’t, it’s worth nothing. The framing is trading, but the underlying experience of picking an outcome, risking money, and winning or losing is the structure of a bet.

Why do prediction markets feel like gambling?

Because the mechanics match. Strip away the financial framing and an event contract has the same ingredients that make gambling hard to put down: a fast result, an uncertain outcome, and a clean win-or-lose payoff you can repeat right away, around the clock. Research on online betting and trading consistently finds that the faster, more continuous, and more accessible an activity is, the more tightly it links to problem gambling. Betting on real events also feels like informed analysis rather than wagering, which is itself a classic gambling trap: the illusion that your knowledge can reliably call a close, uncertain outcome.

Is there research on prediction-market addiction?

Not specifically, not yet. These platforms are new, and the clinical literature hasn’t studied event contracts as their own format. What does exist is a large, consistent body of research on the things prediction markets are made of: rapid, online, app-based betting and trading, and gambling disorder itself. That work shows excessive trading mirrors gambling disorder closely enough that the same diagnostic criteria can be applied to it. So the sensible move is to treat a compulsion here the way you’d treat any gambling problem, rather than wait years for format-specific studies before taking your own experience seriously.

How do I get help if I can't stop betting on prediction markets?

Because compulsive event betting shares the core features of gambling disorder, it responds to the same help, and most people who reach for it get the behavior back under control. The most effective treatment is cognitive behavioral therapy, which targets the chasing, the urges, and the ‘one more bet will fix it’ thinking. Practical steps help too: delete the apps and use blockers, hand account access to a trusted person for a while, and treat any depression or anxiety underneath the betting. For free, confidential support any time, call the National Problem Gambling Helpline at 1-800-GAMBLER (1-800-426-2537).

Get Treatment Help

If you or someone you love is struggling with addiction, getting help is just a phone call away, or consider trying therapy online with BetterHelp.

Exclusive offer: 20% Off BetterHelp*

Following links to the BetterHelp website may earn us a commission that helps us manage and maintain AddictionHelp.com. *Get 20% off your first month of BetterHelp. Offer valid for new BetterHelp users only. Offer cannot be combined with insurance.

11 Sources
  1. Oksanen, A, Mantere, E, Vuorinen, I, Savolainen, I (2022). Gambling and online trading: emerging risks of real-time stock and cryptocurrency trading platforms. Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2022.01.027
  2. Yoshioka, Takashi, So, Ryuhei, Noda, Tatsuya, Kido, Moritoshi, et al. (2025). Association of gambling activities and modalities with problem gambling in Japan: A nationwide cross-sectional online survey-based study. Addictive behaviors reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2025.100595
  3. Delfabbro, Paul, King, Daniel L, Williams, Jennifer (2021). The psychology of cryptocurrency trading: Risk and protective factors. Journal of behavioral addictions. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2021.00037
  4. Fortune, Erica E, Goodie, Adam S (2011). Cognitive distortions as a component and treatment focus of pathological gambling: a review. Psychol Addict Behav. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026422
  5. Lyn, Natalie Leong Wei, Yeo, Hui Yu, Startup, Claudia Choong, Koh, John Ming Yan, et al. (2025). Stock and cryptocurrency trading and problem gambling behavior during early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic: a narrative literature review. Frontiers in psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1585094
  6. Auer, Michael, Griffiths, Mark D (2022). An Empirical Attempt to Operationalize Chasing Losses in Gambling Utilizing Account-Based Player Tracking Data. J Gambl Stud. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-022-10144-4
  7. Grall-Bronnec, Marie, Sauvaget, Anne, Boutin, Claude, Bulteau, Samuel, et al. (2015). Excessive trading, a gambling disorder in its own right? A case study on a French disordered gamblers cohort. Addictive behaviors. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.12.006
  8. Clark, Luke, Boileau, Isabelle, Zack, Martin (2018). Neuroimaging of reward mechanisms in Gambling disorder: an integrative review. Mol Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-018-0230-2
  9. Weinstock, Jeremiah, Rash, Carla J (2014). Clinical and Research Implications of Gambling Disorder in DSM-5. Curr Addict Rep. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-014-0026-7
  10. Slutske, Wendy S (2006). Natural recovery and treatment-seeking in pathological gambling: results of two U.S. national surveys. Am J Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.163.2.297
  11. Pfund, Rory A, Ginley, Meredith K, Kim, Hyoun S, Boness, Cassandra L, et al. (2023). Cognitive-behavioral treatment for gambling harm: Umbrella review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102336
Written by
Jessica Miller is the Content Manager of Addiction Help

Editorial Director

Jessica Miller is the Editorial Director of Addiction Help. Jessica graduated from the University of South Florida (USF) with an English degree and combines her writing expertise and passion for helping others to deliver reliable information to those impacted by addiction. Informed by her personal journey to recovery and support of loved ones in sobriety, Jessica's empathetic and authentic approach resonates deeply with the Addiction Help community.

Reviewed by
  • Fact-Checked
  • Editor
Kent S. Hoffman, D.O. is a founder of Addiction Help

Co-Founder & Chief Medical Officer

Kent S. Hoffman, D.O. has been an expert in addiction medicine for more than 15 years. In addition to managing a successful family medical practice, Dr. Hoffman is board certified in addiction medicine by the American Osteopathic Academy of Addiction Medicine (AOAAM). Dr. Hoffman has successfully treated hundreds of patients battling addiction. Dr. Hoffman is the Co-Founder and Chief Medical Officer of AddictionHelp.com and ensures the website’s medical content and messaging quality.

Real Help. Real Recovery.

Compare centers, explore options and start your path to recovery today.

Find Treatment Now

"AddictionHelp.com is helping to make recovery available to EVERYONE!"

- Angela N.